
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Seed-based webinar follow-up #17 Do you think pellets work better than ...</title>
<link>https://www.ser.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1356507</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 23:51:18 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 May 2017 09:44:22 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2017 Society for Ecological Restoration</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.ser.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=1356507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Seed-based webinar follow-up #17 Do you think pellets work better than ...</title>
<link>https://www.ser.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1356507</link>
<guid>https://www.ser.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1356507</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Seed-based webinar follow-up #17</p>
<p>Do you think pellets work better than seed dibbling?</p>
<p>Directed to: Todd<br />
</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 May 2017 10:04:31 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.ser.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1356523</link>
<guid>https://www.ser.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1356523</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Todd's reply:<br /><br />Our research team has not investigated the possibility of seed dibbling. But, with the large areas that are seeded in mined landscapes (e.g. 10-100 hectares in one pass) seed dibbling may be inefficient and too costly. The development of the seed pellets, coats, and combined with agricultural engineering solutions is our on-going research. I hope to have an update in a few years regarding these new seeding options. Ultimately we aim to combine all these technologies to deal with the diverse seed shapes and species we want in large-scale biodiverse restoration scenarios]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 May 2017 10:44:22 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
