
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Seed-based webinar follow-up #10 In previously farmed fields (intensive)...</title>
<link>https://www.ser.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1356498</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 18:41:11 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 May 2017 13:33:14 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2017 Society for Ecological Restoration</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.ser.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=1356498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Seed-based webinar follow-up #10 In previously farmed fields (intensive)...</title>
<link>https://www.ser.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1356498</link>
<guid>https://www.ser.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1356498</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Seed-based webinar follow-up #10</p>
<p>In previously farmed fields (intensive) is subsurface compaction an issue?</p>
<p>Directed to: Chris<br />
</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 May 2017 09:46:48 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.ser.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1356574</link>
<guid>https://www.ser.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1356574</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Not at our sites, but they are pretty sandy, so compaction really isn't much of an issue.  I don't know anyone around the Midwest or Great Plains who is trying to do anything about previous soil compaction, but that doesn't mean it might not be an issue.  I guess I would be hopeful that establishing a good native community would eventually solve compaction issues by establishing an ever-increasingly strong root system belowground.  Don't really have a good answer for this, though.]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 May 2017 14:33:14 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
