
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Seed-based webinar follow-up #6 Is there a concern with genetic...</title>
<link>https://www.ser.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1356493</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 18:41:16 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 May 2017 13:41:33 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2017 Society for Ecological Restoration</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.ser.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=1356493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Seed-based webinar follow-up #6 Is there a concern with genetic...</title>
<link>https://www.ser.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1356493</link>
<guid>https://www.ser.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1356493</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Seed-based webinar follow-up #6</p>
<p>Is there a concern with genetic bottlenecking when you collect seeds from restored prairies?</p>
<p>Directed to: Chris<br />
</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 May 2017 09:40:18 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.ser.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1356580</link>
<guid>https://www.ser.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1356580</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Yes, but I hope we're mitigating that by also harvesting from remnant prairies.  Restored sites might have a broader range of genetics than many remnants, especially if we do a good job of using seed from multiple sites when harvesting for those sites.  Even so, the plants that actually establish and survive in those restorations might not fully represent the available range of genes in the landscape, so continuing to harvest from a range of remnant sites is probably important.  ]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 May 2017 14:41:33 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
