Society for Ecological Restoration International
Back to SER.ORG
     
SER Northwest Chapter  
  » SERNW Home
  » Become a Member
  » SERNW & TWS-WA Regional Conference 2010
  » Program
  » Featured Speakers
  » Field Trips
  » Workshops
  » Events
  » Calendar
  » Past SERNW Events
  » Sponsored Events
  » For Restoration Practitioners
  » Funding Opportunities
  » For Students
  » Student Guilds
  » Student SERNW Grants
  » Grant Rubric
  » Other Funding Opportunities
  » Your SERNW Board
  » Board of Directors
  » Board Member Bios
  » Meeting Minutes
  » Forms
  » Resource Library
  » Links
  » SERNW Publications
  » Restoration Basics: Design to Dirt
  » Streambank Erosion
  » Reed Canary Grass
  » Contact SERNW
  » Jobs and Internships
  » About SERNW

Student Research Grant Rubric

 

Excellent

Good

Satisfactory

Unacceptable

Scholarly

Merit

Proposal displays originality, strong scientific reasoning,  superior understanding of relevant sociological or biological principles, and clearly states scientific value of study.

Proposal displays originality, sound scientific reasoning,  good understanding of relevant sociological or biological principles, and  states scientific value of study.

Proposal displays originality, some scientific reasoning,  basic understanding of relevant sociological or biological principles, and suggests scientific value of study.

Proposal unoriginal, lacks adequate scientific reasoning, ignores relevant sociological or biological principles, or shows no evidence of scientific value.

Complete-

ness

All requested materials are present and clearly presented.  Proposal contains all information required to make an informed decision

All requested materials are present and clearly presented.  Proposal contains all information required to make an informed decision

All requested materials are present and clearly presented, but leaves us wishing we could ask the candidate a few questions.

Any requested materials are absent, or unclear. 

Feasibility

Project is demonstrably feasible.  Study design shows excellent attention to logistical concerns, and a clear understanding of what is required for success.

Project appears feasible.  Study design shows consideration of logistical concerns, and addresses what is required for success.

Project is probably feasible.  Study design may require more future attention to logistical concerns.

Proposal is unrealistic.

Need

Applicant clearly states the impact that the award will have upon research goals. Award will enable study.

Applicant states the impact that the award will have upon research goals. Award will enhance study.

Applicant states the impact that the award will have upon research goals. Award may enhance study.

Applicant fails to state why award is needed.

 

Back to Student Grant Opportunity Page.

» Home